Revitalize Your Retrospectives

Revitalize Your Retrospectives


Retrospectives are an essential part of Scrum. But too often, when I talk to Scrum teams, they tell me that they’ve stopped doing retrospectives. “We’ve run out of things to improve,” one ScrumMaster said. Another complained that after six sprints, they were saying the same things every retrospective. If your retrospectives have gone stale, here are seven ways to revitalize them.

1. Rotate Leadership

Rather than always have the ScrumMaster lead the retrospective, rotate leadership among team members. Ask each team member to try one new adaptation when he or she leads the retrospective. By doing this, you’ll experiment with new activities and build the team’s group process savvy.

2. Change the Questions

Rather than asking the two standard questions ("What did we do well?" and "What could be improved in the next sprint?"), start by asking, “What happened during the iteration?” Even when people work in the same team room, they see things from a different perspective. Ask about surprises and challenges. Then ask about insights. When you have a list of insights, ask about possible improvements.

3. Vary the Process

If you’ve been leading group discussions, try using structured activities to help the team think together. Reconstruct the timeline of the project to help the team see patterns. Create a histogram that shows how satisfied team members are with the process they used and the product they created during the last sprint. Try using a fishbone diagram to explore root causes. Use dot voting to select improvements for the next sprint.

4. Include Different Perspectives

For the retrospective after a release, include people from the extended project community—people who aren’t part of the team, but who play a critical part in deploying and supporting the software. Focus on understanding and improving the interface between the Scrum team and other parts of the organization.

5. Change the Focus of the Retrospective

If you’ve been concentrating on improving how the team works the Scrum process itself, switch the focus to engineering practices or teamwork. If you’ve been focusing on a narrow goal (“How can we improve the build process?”), try a broad goal for the next retrospective.

6. Try Appreciative Inquiry

Instead of looking at where to improve, look at what’s working well and how you can build on that. Use short, pair interviews to explore questions such as, “When were you at your best on our last sprint?" "Who else was involved?" and "What conditions were present?” After the interviews, put the pairs together in groups of four or six (two pairs or three pairs together) to find common themes.

7. Analyze Recurrent Themes

If your team is bringing up the same issues at each retrospective, examine the list of issues. If nothing changes as the result of your team’s retrospectives, analyze the factors behind inaction. Are the issues related to organizational policies, systems, and structures? You may not be able to change organizational factors right away, but you can use your influence, and the team can change its response. Are the improvements the team chooses included in the next sprint plan? Change plans that are kept separate from daily work fall by the wayside.

Retrospectives are the key for examining and improving methods and teamwork. If they aren’t working for you, inspect and adapt.

Lori Howard

✅ I Help Technology Leaders Find an EPIC Executive Job & Increase Your Visibility, Impact & Income, Guaranteed, with the Strengths-Based System I've Optimized Over 15+ Years Working with Values-Driven Leaders

3y
Like
Reply
Chaning Ogden

Principal Software Engineer at CoreLogic

3y

We recently experienced a retro where it lost sight of continuous improvement and got personal, and combative. There wasn’t anything constructive about it. I have been on the hunt for some insights from others and their experiences to prevent this and bring it back to continuous improvement. I might try some of these, especially number six. Thanks for sharing!

Phil Nesmith

Evolution Guide and Curious Explorer (some say Agile Coach)

3y

Contrary to popular belief in many teams and organizations, I coach the retro as being the most important part of Scrum. (Did I get that from your book? I can’t remember.) Striving for improvement is the magic dust of Agile....and as many of us know, is sadly so often overlooked or lost. As I say in one of my YouTube videos, you cant be agile if there is not a focus on continual improvement. I have seen or experienced so many retrospectives go stale quick when Scrum Masters and teams are just checking the box...or get in a rut covering the same ground in the same way as you point out. Thanks so much for sharing ways to counter this so folks can continue to move forward. 

David Horowitz

CEO at Retrium, Co-author of the second edition of Agile Retrospectives

3y

I've found that teams that actually change something after the retrospective is over are the ones who are most likely to keep running them gong forward. It's the teams that talk and complain, but don't commit to change, that struggle to see the value in the retro.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics