Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Protesters with fake surveillance cameras on their shoulders with Olympic rings
Protesters opposed to AI surveillance during the Olympics demonstrating in Paris in December Photograph: Geoffroy van der Hasselt/AFP/Getty Images
Protesters opposed to AI surveillance during the Olympics demonstrating in Paris in December Photograph: Geoffroy van der Hasselt/AFP/Getty Images

France under fire over fast-track plan for AI video surveillance at Paris Olympics

This article is more than 1 year old

Ministers say exceptional security needed but rights groups warn new law could extend police powers permanently

The French government is fast-tracking special legislation for the 2024 Paris Olympics that would allow the use of video surveillance assisted by artificial intelligence (AI) systems.

Ministers have argued that certain exceptional security measures are needed to ensure the smooth running of the events that will attract 13 million spectators, but rights groups have warned France is seeking to use the Games as a pretext to extend police surveillance powers, which could then become permanent.

The measures include a proposal to legalise the use of AI-assisted video surveillance.

For the first time in France, this would allow automated video camera surveillance, in which AI algorithms would be used to detect suspicious or “abnormal” activity in crowds. These algorithms would analyse video images from fixed CCTV cameras or drones, highlighting behaviour deemed abnormal or suspicious, which would be automatically signalled to police, who could act.

The AI systems would be used to monitor crowds such as the 600,000 people expected at the Paris opening ceremony but could also be used around stadiums, on city streets and on public transport.

The French sports minister, Amélie Oudéa-Castéra, has described the bill as introducing “essential adjustments” in order for the games to run smoothly. The interior minister, Gérald Darmanin, said the bill would give a French “framework” for security for the games.

The proposal comes as France seeks to avoid a repeat of the chaos of last year’s Champions League final between Liverpool and Real Madrid at the Stade de France, where fans including children were teargassed, and many supporters complained they were mugged around the stadium.

The French government has emphasised that its security proposals for the Olympics do not include the use of facial recognition technologies. Ministers have also said automated video surveillance was an experimental measure for a defined period.

But rights groups said the proposal would cover all sporting, festive and cultural events in a broad time frame, which would run from this spring until June 2025, long after the Games ended. They said there was a danger the measure could then become permanent law.

The bill will be considered by the lower house in the national assembly in February after Senate approval on Tuesday, but campaigners have called for more public debate.

Amnesty International called the proposal a “turning point” in the use of AI surveillance technologies in France and said it marked a “dangerous step” for human rights and privacy rights.

Katia Roux, the advocacy officer on technology and human rights at Amnesty International France, said: “We’re deeply worried by the fact that these algorithms will be able to analyse images from fixed CCTV cameras or drones to detect ‘abnormal or suspect’ behaviour. First, there is the issue of defining abnormal or suspect behaviour – who will decide what behaviour is the norm or not? Also, in terms of human rights and fundamental freedoms, we consider the proposal presents a danger to the right to a private life, it could also impact freedom of expression, freedom to meet, and the principle of non-discrimination.”

Roux said that even though the government had said no biometric data would be used, “in reality the algorithms will analyse behaviour, and physical data, which is data that must be protected”.

Roux said the efficiency of such automatic surveillance techniques had not been proved. She said the context of the bill was important, coming amid “French authorities’ very clear will for several years to broaden the surveillance powers of the police”.

Amnesty cautioned that the Games “must not serve as a pretext” to allow exceptional measures to become permanent law.

Roux said there were examples of surveillance laws put in place for special events that were later used repressively, citing Russia’s introduction of facial recognition surveillance during the 2018 football World Cup.

Bastien Le Querrec, of the French NGO La Quadrature du Net, which campaigns on data and privacy issues, said the proposal to authorise video surveillance by algorithm “seems to us particularly dangerous, disproportionate and puts in place a mechanism of mass surveillance”.

He said that until now in France, video surveillance required “a human behind a screen” analysing CCTV footage, which made it impossible to monitor the entire public space all the time. “But with the use of algorithms, that human limit is no longer there – it would be possible to permanently survey all video camera images – and there are several hundreds of thousands of video cameras in France. This means that any person filmed could see their behaviour analysed, their movements detected and classified and decided by algorithm if normal or abnormal.”

He said he feared the Olympics could be presented as a “political moment” to pass legislation that would otherwise be seen as unacceptable.

Most viewed

Most viewed