Sam Kuehnle’s Post

View profile for Sam Kuehnle

Vice President of Marketing at Loxo | Helping companies recruit more intelligently and effectively

Lead Gen vs. Demand Gen - simplified A short breakdown of how the two differ. Lead Gen - Focus: short-term acquisition of "leads" (aka contact info) - Content: gated - Audience intent: low (forced to provide info to access content) Demand Gen - Focus: long-term creation of demand as your ICP comes in + out of market - Content: ungated - Audience intent: high (they come to you when ready to learn more) For those of you who are more visual, below is a quick illustration of what this looks like in practice. More volume of "leads" up top does not mean success at the bottom. If your "leads" aren't truly high-intent, they won't make it very far through the sales process. You can have 10x FEWER "leads" and generate better bottom-of-funnel results if you adopt the long-term strategy. The transition takes a handful of months, but once that snowball starts rolling it quickly makes up for lost time. And yes, the conversion rates here are real - I've witnessed these firsthand when helping companies make the transition from lead to demand gen. #marketing #demandgen #b2bmarketing

  • No alternative text description for this image
Chris Tait

Sales Leader | Helping tech startups build and scale revenue teams from scratch | Cyb3r Operations | Demeter

2y

What these funnels are missing are the "Cost Per Lead" and "Cost Per High-Intent Submissions", as well as the total revenue created. Ultimately, when deciding which is better, all that matters is Expense : Revenue. Go with whichever is higher, then there is no argument as to which is best. Focus on the outcome. The right funnel is great and important, but the left will always be needed, especially for fast growing tech companies who need to expand rapidly into new regions. Lead Gen will always play a crucial, and cost effective way to do this. It wont ever go away completely. The question is "How do I do Lead Gen with minimul waste, focussing on Revenue, not number of leads". Its tricky, but not impossible. At EIMS everything we do is about improving that E:R metric.

Robert G. Brown II

Transforming Customer Insights into Revenue Growth - Uncover Your Business's Hidden Potential.

2y

View from a different perspective. The lead gen image represents casting as wide a net as possible - extending reach. This perspective is supported by KPIs tracked by executives and optimized by marketing and sales. They are used to having a different content strategy designed to get a name, tracking conversations, and conversions. The demand gen image represents enticing only those who are interested - a different content strategy. It requires executives to look at different KPIs that are optimized by marketing and sales. To transition requires a solid story backed by data and examples. Where do these stories and data come from - voice of the customer, customer journeys? It requires a change in marketing content and strategy. It requires a change in sales strategy and tactics. Is one better than another? Milage will vary depending on the inputs ($$$ & resources), expectations, and if the results under, equal, or over perform expectations.

Aaron H.

Top Brand Development Voice | Chief Marketer at AH Marketing | Your B2B Fractional Marketing Team | We ❤️ Marketing Challenges

2y

This is clever. And I see the point regarding pipeline quality. However, from an actual definition standpoint, demand generation is not simply better lead generation. Demand Generation encompasses all the strategies and tactics the marketing team employs to drive interest (demand) for a product or service. This includes how you message, where those messages appear, to whom, and the business opportunities that result from those messages (not always a direct sales opportunity). For instance, you could create demand and see an uptick in requests for partnerships, integrations, thought leadership (expertise), and the like as well.

Mia Čomić

I help B2B companies create stories that stick | Bublgam

2y

Gated content is not the only way to generate leads. The difference is that when it comes to generating leads, you are trying to attract people that already have a problem that you're solving; with demand generation, you are trying to help people become aware of the problem they have or communicate there is something that can make their lives easier/better. In B2B, demand generation is mostly about shifting the prospect's perception about your product/service from it being something that's "nice-to-have" opposed to a "must-have".

Mark Kilens

CEO and Co-founder of TACK ⛵️ & ClubPF ⚓️ | On a mission to get rid of generic go-to-market with People-first GTM

2y

Lead gen is now just brand marketing.

Coleton Hutchins, MBA, QKC, QKA

Organizational Mobilizer / Professional Development Instigator / Strategy / B2B Marketing / Content Creator

2y

The best way to leverage small sales and marketing teams is demand generation - it's no contest. It's imperative your sales reps are doing high value work rather than spending it doing menial tasks that could be "outsourced" to better website or tech experience. How long, give or take, would you say this transition should take? 1-2 years if done properly?

Christopher Rack

♟️CEO @ pharosIQ | Challenging the Status Quo, Lego Collector, Speed chess fan♟️

2y

The problem is the input. Do you think “high intent submissions” just grow on trees for the B2B space. Most companies in B2B have TAMs in the 10’s of thousands total- to think there will be hundreds of in market opps (and that you can identify and capture them) is an unrealistic expectation. Your % for leads to opps conversion over time and closed won rate is also about 5-6x lower than what it is in reality land for well executing teams.

Elyse Lazartic

#UnMarketing SVP accelerating growth in health-tech companies by relentlessly asking "Why?" | 🚀 5x PE Brand Integrations | Casual blogger, occasional speaker, AI-curious.

2y

Analyzing our conversion rates on different pieces of gated today... less than 1% on most lite reads that we produce (ebooks), ~5% on long-format reports, 10-25% on ready to talk forms... Then I wrote down in my notebook, "What are we afraid of?" .. but it IS a huge leap to make as a marketer trained to drive to the form fill. Will be a paradigm shift I'll be pushing for.

I would like to see this information broken down between category leaders and non category leaders. I would say for sure, Demand Gen among category leaders more so than lead gen makes senses. Those brands have already crossed the chasm into mainstream b2b and are a well recognized brand. But for small emerging brands, while demand gen should be a part of the strategy, there is simply ZERO time to wait for demand to appear when you have real cash flow issues to be addressed to move your business forward. No?

Seth Temko

Chief Strategist, Go-to-Market Expert, MBA

2y

Over what period of time? Leads are all about time and touches for improvement. If the graphic represents the same period of time then of course high intent is going to do better. It's your ability to curate awareness and education as the "leads" become high intent buyers that will win the day steadily over time.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics