Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Cattle roam across burnt-out land in a conservation area in Pará state, Brazil, 26 August 2021.
Cattle roam across burnt-out land in a conservation area in Pará state, Brazil, 26 August 2021. Photograph: Lucas Landau/The Guardian
Cattle roam across burnt-out land in a conservation area in Pará state, Brazil, 26 August 2021. Photograph: Lucas Landau/The Guardian

Could AI save the Amazon rainforest?

This article is more than 11 months old

Conservationists in the Brazilian Amazon are using a new tool to predict the next sites of deforestation – and it may prove a gamechanger in the war on logging

It took just the month of March this year to fell an area of forest in Triunfo do Xingu equivalent to 700 football pitches. At more than 16,000 sq km, this Environmental Protection Area (APA) in the south-eastern corner of the Brazilian Amazon, in the state of Pará, is one of the largest conservation areas in the world. And according to a new tool that predicts where deforestation will happen next, it’s also the APA at highest risk of even more destruction.

The tool, PrevisIA, is an artificial intelligence platform created by researchers at environmental nonprofit Imazon. Instead of trying to repair damage done by deforestation after the fact, they wanted to find a way to prevent it from happening at all.

PrevisIA pinpointed Triunfo do Xingu as the APA at highest risk of deforestation in 2023, with 271.52 sq km of forest in the conservation area expected to be lost by the end of the year. About 5 sq km had already been destroyed in March.

Home to the endangered white-cheeked spider monkey and other vulnerable and near-threatened species, such as the hyacinth macaw and the jaguar, the conservation area is rich in biodiversity often found nowhere else in the world. But its land runs through two municipalities, Altamira and São Félix do Xingu, with some of the highest rates of deforestation in the country. And despite Triunfo do Xingu being protected under Brazilian law, illegal activities – mining, logging, land-grabbing – have ravaged the area, stripping it bare in places.

But with PrevisIA, there is the potential for change. Imazon is now establishing partnerships with authorities across the region, with the aim of stopping deforestation before it starts.

Destruction across the Brazilian Amazon is creeping close to an all-time high. According to SAD, Imazon’s Deforestation Alert System, deforestation this March tripled compared to the same month last year, and the first quarter of 2023 saw 867 sq km of rainforest destroyed – the second largest area felled in the past 16 years.

The idea for PrevisIA emerged in 2016, when the team at Imazon analysed data collected from SAD satellite images. Tired of getting notifications after large swaths of forest had already been cleared, they asked themselves: is it possible to generate short-term deforestation prediction models?

“Existing deforestation prediction models were long-term, looking at what would happen in decades,” says Carlos Souza Jr, senior researcher at Imazon and project coordinator of PrevisIA and SAD. “We needed a new tool that could get ahead of the devastation.”

Souza and his team – a computer engineer, a consultant in geostatistics and two researchers – began developing a new model capable of generating annual predictions. They published their findings in the journal Spatial Statistics in August 2017.

A deforested area on a stretch of the BR-230 (Trans-Amazonian Highway) in Humaitá, Amazonas State, Brazil. Photograph: Michael Dantas/AFP/Getty Images

The model takes a two-pronged approach. First, it focuses on trends present in the region, looking at geostatistics and historical data from Prodes, the annual government monitoring system for deforestation in the Amazon. Understanding what has happened can help make predictions more precise. When already deforested areas are recent, this indicates gangs are operating in the area, so there’s a higher risk that nearby forest will soon be wiped out.

Second, it looks at variables that put the brakes on deforestation – land protected by Indigenous and quilombola (descendent of rebel slaves) communities, and areas with bodies of water, or other terrain that doesn’t lend itself to agricultural expansion, for instance – and variables that make deforestation more likely, including higher population density, the presence of settlements and rural properties, and higher density of road infrastructure, both legal and illegal.

“They are the arteries of destruction of the forest,” says Souza, referring to unofficial roads that snake through the Amazon to facilitate illegal industrial activities. “These roads create the conditions for new deforestation.”

Monitoring the construction of these roads is crucial to predicting – and eventually preventing – deforestation. According to Imazon, 90% of accumulated deforestation is concentrated within 5.5km of a road. Logging is even closer, with 90% taking place within 3km, and 85% of fires within 5km.

Researchers used to comb through thousands of satellite images to see whether they could spot new roads slicing through the biome. With PrevisIA, the work is handed over to an AI algorithm that automates mapping, allowing for quicker analysis and, in turn, more frequent updates.

The hyacinth macaw, the world’s largest flying parrot, is among the vulnerable species to be found in Triunfo do Xingu. Photograph: Mauro Pimentel/AFP/Getty Images

But without a robust computational platform and the ability to update road maps more quickly, PrevisIA couldn’t be put into action. It wasn’t until 2021 that the team at Imazon partnered with Microsoft and Fundo Vale, acquiring the cloud computing power they needed to run the AI algorithm for mapping roads.

“Technology has always been the reason we’ve been able to control deforestation,” says Juliano Assunção, executive director of the Climate Policy Initiative and professor at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio). “PrevisIA is a natural evolution of this incorporation of technology in the fight to protect the Amazon, and one with a lot of potential.”

While technology is crucial for PrevisIA to work, who uses it will be what makes the difference. Assunção notes the obvious entities who could benefit from using PrevisIA – government agencies at all levels, tasked with protecting the rainforest – but he also cites those not directly involved in monitoring the Amazon, banks, investors and those who buy products from the region, who could use the information to make better decisions, both from an economic and an environmental point of view.

So far, Imazon has official partnerships with a handful of state prosecutor’s offices in the region. They hope that their use of PrevisIA will lead to less punishment and more prevention.

“We don’t want to have to keep coming in after the damage has already been done,” says José Godofredo Pires dos Santos, a public prosecutor in Pará and coordinator of the environmental operational support centre. “We’re always working to penalise these environmental crimes and irregularities. But from the environmental side, the damage has already been done. We want to reverse that logic. We want to find a way to prevent it from ever happening.”

Pires dos Santos’s team has been having weekly meetings with Imazon to get up to speed on how they can best use PrevisIA. He expects they’ll start putting the system to use in the second half of 2023.

In Acre in western Brazil, the state prosecutor’s office hopes for the same. The idea, says prosecutor Arthur Cezar Pinheiro Leite, is for PrevisIA to notify monitoring agencies of high-risk areas, so they can keep a closer watch and so that prosecutors can warn property owners or others in the region that they will be held responsible if deforestation occurs.

“We want them to know we’re aware of what’s going on,” Leite says. “And if that deforestation does still manage to happen, they’ll be punished and serve as an example for others considering doing the same.”

So far, Souza says PrevisIA’s accuracy has been “fantastic”. Of all its deforestation alerts, 85% have been within 4km of the predicted location. Just over 49% of alerts have been in areas classified as high or very high risk. He and his team are constantly working to improve their model, but he also hopes that, one day, they get it wrong.

“If that happens,” he says, “it’ll mean prevention is working.”

Most viewed

Most viewed