Writing test automation standards is a journey, not a destination

I have started to automate tests in Playwright with TypeScript.  I am now writing standards for the tests. I view writing the standards as a journey because I am adding to the standards as I learn more.

 I have started to create these standards because:

  • It helps me get my thoughts in order
  • It helps me learn from my mistakes because I won’t repeat errors.
  • I can always add to the standards, such as when I started to use describe blocks and needed a naming convention for them.
  • The standards help to share knowledge.
  • Standards facilitate collaborative working because they enable test automation engineers to work in a consistent way
  • I want to be able to maintain the tests easily

I have found lots of useful advice in testing and programming literature:

  • “Any organization that wants to move fast will have standards in place” [1].
  • Standards can be grouped under headings such as naming conventions, coding standards, user interaction conventions, file structures, configuration management practices and tools [1].
  • Standardise is one of the Five S’s and standards help us “reduce complexity over time to improve ease of maintenance” [2] when developing software.
  • It is best to adopt naming conventions at the start of developing the test suite in order to avoid a free-for-all which will make it difficult to find scripts and files as the test suites get larger.[3]
  • “All standards should be simple to follow and make maintainability easier”[4].
  • Naming conventions improve the readability and maintainability of your Playwright Testing framework [5]

I have also learned from colleagues in a book club that it is useful to say why the standard is needed because at a later date, its need may not be obvious and it could be removed. 

Writing standards for test automation is a journey not a destination because I am learning and putting that learning into the standards. 

If you have more sources of information about writing test automation standards please let me know. 

References

[1] Implementing Lean Software Development by Mary and Tom Poppendieck (2007, p193)

[2] Implementing Lean Software Development by Mary and Tom Poppendieck (2007, p192)

[3] Software Test Automation by Mark Fewster and Dorothy Graham (1999, p197)

[4] Agile Testing by Lisa Crispin and Janet Gregory (2009, p227)

[5] Using naming conventions to improve the readability and maintenability of your Playwright Testing framework by Boyana Staneva (2023)

Published by Mike Harris

Mike has been working in testing for 20 years and is the lone tester for Geckoboard. He has been a Test Lead and has also worked as a part of waterfall, lean and agile teams. He has a B.Sc.(HONS) from Middlesex University and is an Associate of the University of Hertfordshire. He has set up and led a Testing Community of Practice and been part of a successful agile transition. He is Vice-Chair of the British Computer Society’s Specialist Interest Group in Software Testing. He also contributed to the e-books Testing Stories and How Can I test This? and has had articles published by the Ministry of Testing, LambdaTest and The QA Lead.

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started