Just the type of answers I predicted in my post.
Of course mostIDEs point look similar whether you look at some decade old Borland tool or the current Visual Studio. However with this Samsung tool, it's just an odd job of copying Apple. I'm sure you're already familiar with Visual Studio, but let's take a look at it just for comparison's sake.
Image
Notice the icons, the properties box, etc, etc. It conforms the standard Windows style very closely. Look at Delphi's IDE. All standard issue Windows stuff (man I loved Delphi and Borland Pascal back in the days...)
Then you look at xcode.
Image
Look at the OSX standard gradation of the boxes. Look at the toolbar icon arrangements. Look at the widget box on the bottom right. Clearly, this is an OSX IDE made to fit the style of Apple's OSX UI elements. Similar to Visual Studio in the overall arrangement but clearly different in styling. I think we can agree on that.
Now we move onto Samsung's tool, again this is a Windows program.
Image
Sure the window arrangements are pretty standard across most IDEs, but look at the gradation syling, the icons, the toolbar, the box with controls on the right bottom, etc. Whoever made this thing, deliberately put a ton of effort to make it look like xcode. Heck, look at the Windows buttons on the top right corner, they look completely out of place in the software.
I mean, this is very clearly a Windows IDE trying to mimic xcode in look&feel and it's such an obvious copy job by Samsung. Yet you two are trying to side skirt the issue and try to use the "all IDEs look the same" card. Are you sure you aren't as biased as the most extreme Apple fans, just at the opposite end of the spectrum?