Abstract
Animal communication is typically non-syntactic, which means that signals refer to whole situations1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Human language is syntactic, and signals consist of discrete components that have their own meaning8. Syntax is a prerequisite for taking advantage of combinatorics, that is, “making infinite use of finite means”9,10,11. The vast expressive power of human language would be impossible without syntax, and the transition from non-syntactic to syntactic communication was an essential step in the evolution of human language12,13,14,15,16. We aim to understand the evolutionary dynamics of this transition and to analyse how natural selection can guide it. Here we present a model for the population dynamics of language evolution, define the basic reproductive ratio of words and calculate the maximum size of a lexicon. Syntax allows larger repertoires and the possibility to formulate messages that have not been learned beforehand. Nevertheless, according to our model natural selection can only favour the emergence of syntax if the number of required signals exceeds a threshold value. This result might explain why only humans evolved syntactic communication and hence complex language.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Von Frisch, K. The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1967).
Marler, P. Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels? Am. Sci. 58, 669–673 (1970).
Wilson, E. O. Animal communication. Sci. Am. 227, 52– 60 (1972).
Gould, J. L. & Marler, P. Learning by instinct. Sci. Am. 256, 74–85 ( 1987).
Burling, R. Primate calls, human language, and nonverbal communication. Curr. Anthropol. 34, 25–53 ( 1989).
Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species (Chicago Univ. Press, 1990 ).
Hauser, M. The Evolution of Communication (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996).
Bickerton, D. Species and Language (Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago, 1990).
von Humboldt, W. Linguistic Variability and Intellectual Development (Pennsylvania Univ. Press, Philadelphia, 1972).
Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1965).
Jackendoff, R. The Architecture of the Language Faculty (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1997).
Pinker, S. & Bloom, P. Natural language and natural selection. Behav. Brain Sci. 13, 707– 784 (1990).
Pinker, S. The Language Instinct. (Harper Collins, New York, 1994 ).
Maynard Smith, J. & Szathmary, E. The Major Transitions in Evolution (Freeman, Oxford, 1995).
Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M. & Knight, C. Approaches to the Evolution of Language (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
Nowak, M. A. & Krakauer, D. C. The evolution of language. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8028– 8033 (1999).
Chomsky, N. Language and Mind (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 1972).
Chomsky, N. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures (MIT Press, Cambridge, Masachusetts, 1988).
Premack, D. Gavagai! or the future history of the animal language controversy. Cognition 19, 207–296 ( 1985).
Lieberman, P. The Biology and Evolution of Language (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984).
Bates, E., Thal, D. & Marchman, V. in Biological and Behavioural Determinants of Language Development (eds Krasnegor et al.) (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1991).
Zipf, G. K. The Psychobiology of Language (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, 1935).
Miller, G. A. & Chomsky, N. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology . Vol. 2 (eds Luce, R. D., Bush, R. & Galauter, E.) 419–491 (Wiley, New York, 1963).
Dunbar, R. Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Leon Levy and Shelby White Initiatives Fund, the Florence Gould Foundation, the J. Seward Johnson Sr Charitable Trusts, the Ambrose Monell Foundation, the National Science Foundation, the Wellcome Trust and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nowak, M., Plotkin, J. & Jansen, V. The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature 404, 495–498 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35006635
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35006635
This article is cited by
-
From collocations to call-ocations: using linguistic methods to quantify animal call combinations
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2022)
-
The evolution of languages of thought
Biology & Philosophy (2019)
-
The Evolution of Compositionality in Signaling Games
Journal of Logic, Language and Information (2016)
-
Contextual correlates of syntactic variation in mountain and western gorilla close-distance vocalizations: Indications for lexical or phonological syntax?
Animal Cognition (2015)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.